In today’s fast-paced business environment, investors and executives expect transactions to be executed efficiently without compromising quality – be that acquiring a company, securing financing, or closing a commercial transaction. However, in Tanzania, the choice between electronic and wet ink signatures can be one of the key factors impacting whether a deal moves forward smoothly or faces unexpected delays.
For instance, there have been situations where an investor, eager to finalise a financing agreement, encounters delays due to varying interpretations of electronic signature acceptance by certain regulatory bodies, despite electronic signatures being valid under Tanzanian law. Similarly, companies have experienced delays when electronically signed agreements are not immediately recognised by all regulators, resulting in additional processing time. In other instances, requiring wet ink signatures when an electronic one would suffice can create unnecessary administrative steps, which may lead to inefficiencies and longer timelines for closing deals.
While electronic signatures have been legally recognised in Tanzania for nearly a decade, their acceptance can vary significantly across regulators, industries, and specific transactions. For investors, understanding when electronic signatures are accepted, when wet ink signatures are still required, and the potential consequence of non-compliance is crucial to avoid operational disruptions and ensure smooth deal execution.
This article provides insights into these practical considerations, helping investors navigate the complexities of signature requirements in Tanzania.
--
Read the full publication at ALN
